Theres no way to twist the definition of cigarette so a vaping device fits it
Applying Bayess rule, we have odds(smoker | cancer) = odds(smoker) * p(cancer | smoker) / p(cancer | non-smoker) Rearranging terms, we can solve for the risk ratio: p(cancer | smoker) / p(cancer | non-smoker) = odds(smoker | cancer) / odds(smoker) = 16 Thats the answer I had in mind, but let me address an objection raised by one poll respondent, who chose Other because, You cant draw casual inferences from observational data without certain assumptions which Im unwilling to make. Thats true
If you need packing tape, bring your own or be prepared to buy some at the Post Office
Anyone who smokes is at risk of becoming dependent
The problem is that when you try to avoid what youre feeling and what youre thinking, you paradoxically create more of what youre trying to avoid, said Jonathan Bricker, lead author of the new study and a professor in the cancer prevention program at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle
